Forum Posts

Abdulllah Alamin
Jun 27, 2022
In DIY Forum
A business, its owner, and the owner's wife were defamed by a disgruntled investor who hid their identities and published websites, YouTube videos, and a Ripoff report. Lawyers for the injured parties found out who posted the information by obtaining the Shadow Making person's IP address, then sued the defamer and obtained a court order. When the removal request was first submitted, Google denied it without any explanation. Then, when resubmitted, Google Shadow Making asked for additional evidence to prove that the defendant had been properly notified, which was done in person via a court process server. Google demanded evidence that the defendant wrote the content of the Ripoff report, as the defendant had removed all other material. Lawyers provided IP evidence from the Ripoff report and a YouTube video submitted to the court order – both showed the same Shadow Making user email address and IP address used. Google then summarily denied the request without any explanation. To take a look at the other side of the coin - the requests that Google complies with - we can look at another case. In this case, a woman was defamed and misrepresented by someone who Shadow Making posted on numerous URLs accusing her of having an affair with the accuser's husband, in some cases even sharing a photo of the woman. Google previously denied the removal request, then in mid-February agreed to remove most of the specified content. Posts that Google agreed to remove from its results included posts on Ripoff Report. Pissed Consumer, and USAComplaints Confusion makes decision making in such cases very difficult For victims of defamation and the lawyers who represent Shadow Making them, this situation continues to be confusing and upsetting. Without some consistency, it is quite difficult to determine whether it will be desirable to initiate expensive legal proceedings. Imagine someone has anonymously vilified you or your online business with tens, hundreds, or even thousands Shadow Making of posts that misrepresent you. The legal process to handle the issue is as follows: You must go to court to get a subpoena to get information from the publisher.
0
0
2
 

Abdulllah Alamin

More actions